Not one of the six donkeys that star in Jerzy Skolimowski’s Oscar contender EO will obtain a statue on the 2023 Oscars ceremony, even when the movie does pull off an unlikely upset within the Greatest Worldwide Function Movie class in opposition to its stiffest competitors, Edward Berger’s All Quiet on the Western Entrance. Animals aren’t eligible for Academy Awards, although loads of films embraced by the Academy have featured animal actors, like Terry (Toto in The Wizard of Oz) and Popcorn Deelites (Seabiscuit in Seabiscuit).
However centering EO on a donkey as the topic relatively than as an object, because the star relatively than a supporting determine, is what makes Skolimowski’s film a novel expertise, each in and out of doors the context of the Oscars. No matter does win Greatest Worldwide Function Movie shall be downright standard in comparison with EO, a film that makes one of the best argument but that movies want extra animal views.
Skolimowski, the eclectic veteran Polish filmmaker, painter, and actor behind films like Important Killing and 11 Minutes (and a bit participant, oddly sufficient, in 2012’s MCU film The Avengers), filters EO by way of the eyes of its protagonist, a lovable, lonely, misplaced donkey ambling across the Polish and Italian countryside. As a lot as a digicam can present an viewers the world based on a beast, cinematographer Michał Dymek tries. EO’s eyes are Dymek’s fixed, an anchor he returns to repeatedly for response pictures between representations of humankind’s worst and finest. The donkeys enjoying EO can’t act or react as a human performer would: He comes throughout as unflappable, placid and funky. However his expressionlessness is an invite to think about how he sees what we see.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24492337/EO_Up_Close.jpg)
Picture: Janus Movies
Skolimowski’s contribution to cinema’s “unhappy donkey” area of interest joins movies like 1966’s Au Hasard Balthazar, alongside 2022’s Oscar-nominated examples Triangle of Unhappiness and The Banshees of Inisherin. It’s additionally kin to films about critters apart from donkeys, like Kelly Reichardt’s First Cow and Michael Sarnoski’s Pig: productions that respect their animal companions as characters, however nonetheless hand the narrative reins to people.
EO is an abiding tragedy. Heartbreak is baked into the film’s logline: EO, a donkey fortunately performing earlier than adoring circus crowds along with his handler, Kasandra (Sandra Drzymalska), is wrested from her custody by the state. After a collection of transfers from one proprietor to a different, he escapes and hoofs it throughout creation, ostensibly making an attempt to wend his approach again to Kasandra. His misadventures on the way in which vary from the nice and cozy to the bizarre to the horrific.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24492355/EO_Waterfall.jpg)
Picture: Janus Movies
“The state” on this film is led by a pompous authorities official who, after liberating the circus’s menagerie from the performers, pats himself on the again with a speech about “amending irregularities.” Skolimowski lays out his thesis proper right here: The individuals least certified to manage animal welfare are those in positions of energy, relatively than individuals like Kasandra, whose love for EO is tender and unconditional. Admittedly, one in every of Kasandra’s fellow circus folks does abuse EO, however he doesn’t deal with individuals a lot otherwise. All through the movie, there are numerous ambassadors for human-animal connections who maintain stronger credentials than he does.
The farmers who welcome EO to their steady; the special-needs youngsters who go to the farm and bathe him with affection and petting; the soccer followers who undertake him as their mascot after profitable a recreation in opposition to their rivals; richling Vito (Lorenzo Zurzolo), who whisks EO away from a criminal offense scene to his household’s villa, and chats with him like an outdated good friend relatively than a random donkey — these characters symbolize humanity in one of the best mild potential as stewards for animal well-being.
Alternatively, there’s the furrier who kills caged foxes; the shedding soccer workforce’s violent hooligan followers, who take out their frustrations on EO; and the hunters creeping by way of the foreboding woods at evening, lighting their approach with inexperienced laser sights. Collectively, they make up the “individuals suck” facet of EO’s journey.
However winnowing the film right down to that misanthropic message serves Skolimowski’s work poorly. EO sugarcoats nothing: Humanity’s darkest tendencies are proven in unflinching element, all the way in which as much as homicide. (Vito’s relationships along with his impassioned stepmother — performed by Isabelle Huppert along with her typical stage of hard-jawed depth — doesn’t recommend a lot religion in human relationships, both.) However there’s mild in that darkness, a wellspring of goodwill towards man, all mirrored within the bottomless depth of EO’s gaze. He’s conscious of the kindnesses proven him and the cruelties inflicted on him, even when he isn’t the main focus of the body, or within the body in any respect. And he’s conscious that he misses his caretaker and hopes to return to her, to the purpose the place he leaves idyllic security to go discover her, as donkey-POV flashes make it clear what he’s pondering.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24492359/EO_transport.jpg)
Picture: Janus Movies
It’s uncommon that the Oscars acknowledge a movie like EO, the place an animal takes the highlight and people play the secondary forged. If the Academy had ignored Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert’s The whole lot In all places All at As soon as, EO would indisputably be the yr’s most unusual nominee. For all The whole lot In all places’s idiosyncrasies, although, the Daniels are invested within the human situation, explored from a human viewpoint.
EO invests within the animal viewpoint. Not even Seabiscuit could make that declare. The matter of expertise noticed is significant; whereas each movie is an opportunity to see the world by way of one other individual’s eyes, films hardly ever supply the identical alternative for animals. And of the movies that do, subsequent to none of them attain the type of stage the Academy Awards afford. The Academy might do with extra films like EO — however most of all, moviegoers might too.
EO is streaming on The Criterion Channel, and is accessible for rental or buy on Amazon, Vudu, and different digital platforms.