Supercell’s enduring farming hit, Hay Day, was printed exactly 10 years in the past – June 21 2012, a mere two months previous to the studio’s breakaway title, Conflict of Clans. Nonetheless, regardless of being constantly overshadowed by its youthful sibling, Hay Day has remained a steadfast success for the agency.
Stephan Demirdjian and Camilla Avellar, former Hay Day recreation lead and designers, respectively, and artist Sari Latvala shared their ideas on a decade’s classes and alternative in retaining Hay Day not solely alive however flourishing, and the relative simplicity of cell video games growth within the business’s nascent period.
2012–2013
The earliest Hay Days, and creating video games with no content material or social pipeline
Stephan Demirdijan: The market was very completely different – maybe extra blue ocean than it’s now. These days, once we launch video games, there are such a lot of extra concerns than weren’t as required again within the day. Corresponding to fully-mapped social paths and a powerful plan of future options in response to what different video games have delivered to the market, that weren’t so seen to the early cell enjoying viewers.
Lengthy story brief, making video games has turn into a much bigger ask. Because the market and the viewers matured, so did the complexity and what has turn into attainable with cell gaming. These expectations at the moment are tied to new recreation growth, and what you will need to have prepared from the get-go, so as to have the perfect launch.
Sari Latvala: Again in these days, you spent most of your time fascinated by making video games that had been enjoyable, and fewer concerning the construction of monetisation or social interactivity. These days, the completely different parts to take into consideration has created a variety of stress when publishing something; you nearly danger leaving that central significance of enjoyable behind, whilst you’re pondering of all the pieces else.
The consolation in creating one thing in an unknown sector
Camilla Avellar: some dates forward of this dialog, the Apple App Retailer had launched simply 4 years earlier than the discharge of Hay Day, in 2008. Nobody actually knew what the way forward for cell gaming could be like: again then, we thought tablets could be the most important disruptor in cell gaming, and naturally it turned out to be the telephone. It was such an attention-grabbing time with so many unknowns.
Latvala: We didn’t have something comply with, proper? There have been no farming recreation successes, again then-
Demirdijan: On cell!
Again then, we thought tablets could be the most important disruptor in cell gaming
Camilla Avellar
Latvala: Sure, in fact! Loads of individuals had been enjoying farming video games on Fb, however we needed to outline what our farming recreation was, with out something equal to take a look at. However that was an excellent problem, having to invent each single a part of it.
Demirdijan: The group was very conscious of the successes different corporations had been having on Fb. However there was no farming recreation accessible on cell. I nonetheless bear in mind the tales the group had – realising their very own spin was the contact controls for easy actions like weeding or sowing crops. That was when the items got here collectively, the primary level the group began to consider that it was going to work.
Avellar: Sure, this was very a lot about making a recreation that was mobile-first.
2014-2015
Creating Hay Day’s spine: its social attraction
Demirdijan: The primary two years, we had been principally centered on simply bringing extra content material to the sport. As a result of its success took the unique group without warning – and typically it nonetheless wasn’t sufficient, as a result of gamers had been ready shortly full the accessible content material in a short time – and we started to concentrate on the later ranges, to make sure there was a backend to the sport.
However as soon as we acquired one step forward of them, we had been in a great place to consider what Hay Day actually required to drive it additional. That’s when the phrase social was actually pushed as the important thing aspect, and once we incorporates alliances – as Hay Day calls them, neighbourhoods.
Latvala: Including the social facet was at all times on the desk, however 2014 was actually once we might make it work.
Demirdijan: Following this, we constructed the derby characteristic, which gave neighbourhoods a purpose to play collectively collaboratively but additionally with competitors in thoughts. That was one of many greatest modifications and, one of many causes gamers have continued enjoying Hay Day for years.
The footsteps of Conflict of Clans’ social focus
Avellar: Earlier than the derby characteristic, neighbourhoods had been only a place to speak and maybe do some buying and selling. It was very restricted.
Demirdijan: Conflict of Clans launched with alliances from the get-go. However for Hay Day, our first strategy was to create one thing akin to a single-player expertise. However all through the years, we realised that farming might be a really social expertise too. I feel that is without doubt one of the main classes all through Hay Day’s years.
Conflict of Clans launched with alliances from the get-go. However for Hay Day, our first strategy was to create one thing akin to a single-player expertise
Stephan Demirdjian
Establishing Hay Day’s artwork model, and resisting finest observe
Latvala: The core concept was humorous and quirky humour – one aspect of Hay Day is that nothing dangerous ever actually occurs, which is knowledgeable by its Fifties-esque artwork model.
Demirdijan: You talked about nothing dangerous occurs in Hay Day, and that’s actually mirrored in a number of the in-game depictions – for instance, the way you accumulate bacon from pigs by way of a bespoke pig sauna.
It might have been very straightforward for the group to go full-cutesiness. However, rightfully so, they selected an interesting however extra uncommon artwork model, which is extra distinctive and fewer interchangeable as different cell video games kinds might have been.
Avellar: I bear in mind one of many authentic artists was adamant he didn’t need to do cute – “I need to draw orcs, and evil!” – so when he was concerned with Hay Day, he made certain it wasn’t overly cute.
2016-2017
Retention over monetisation, and creating an everlasting title
Demirdijan: Absolutely the precedence – our one metric – is retention. So, I don’t bear in mind ever actually strongly fascinated by monetisation, particularly within the earliest years. If we centered on retention, we felt that if we give our gamers sufficient constructive causes to maintain enjoying and create their very own habits and play kinds, ultimately they may really feel snug spending cash on areas they really feel are value spending on.
Avellar: Inside 4 years of launch, we already had a powerful sense that our participant base was very loyal. We knew, kind of, what they needed to see within the recreation and we needed to proceed that pattern. I really feel we had been very profitable in that.
The affect of Conflict of Clans, and shifting help from Hay Day
Demirdijan: Clearly Conflict of Clans was a fair larger success, however that’s to not downplay the success of Hay Day. I feel any firm could be extraordinarily glad to have a hit of Hay Day’s calibre however, in fact, Conflict of Clans is a very completely different planet in that regard.
If the Conflict of Clans group wanted help, and Hay Day was the place we might reallocate assets, Conflict of Clans could be the precedence
Stephan Demirdjian
However when it got here to group assets, we tried to stay by this order: Supercell first, group second, people third, though it’s not at all times that black-and-white. We had to consider what was finest for the corporate.
So, if the Conflict of Clans group wanted help, and Hay Day was the place we might reallocate assets, Conflict of Clans could be the precedence. Generally it was painful, however we discovered methods to steadiness it out.
Avellar: Usually, we had flexibility to make sure Hay Day was by no means under-resourced. It was by no means as if our group was sidelined.
Latvala: This was accomplished by means of robust pre-planning, figuring out what number of updates we needed to make within the 12 months, and having a backup plan if the group was supporting Conflict of Clans. Quite a lot of planning forward.
Demirdijan: Perhaps in different corporations, prior to now, that is completely different however, particularly, in my function as group lead, I’d by no means describe Supercell as a political firm. I by no means needed to fear about being misled – I’d sit down with the Conflict of Clans lead, and we’d create a plan collectively, for the sake of Supercell, with out having to fret about something hidden within the background or being conscious of retaining my guard up.
It was a case of sitting down for a espresso, discussing our wants, checking our planner, and doing this as casually as attainable. It was at all times a pleasure ambiance, even when it was difficult.
—
Within the subsequent instalment, Demirdjian, Avellar and Latvala focus on the affect of latest genres, together with the hypercasual increase, and dealing on Hay Day in the course of the first of the pandemic years.
